<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Culture &#187; sydney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://global-culture.org/destinations/sydney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://global-culture.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable, Memorable, Livable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>liveability rankings 2009</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ALL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abu dhabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auckland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cape town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dusseldorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not much has changed since the last time I reported on the Liveability report from The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2007.   Vancouver is still the best place to live overall according to the 2009 ranking:</p>

Vancouver, Canada
Vienna, Austria
Melbourne, Australia
Toronto, Canada
Perth, Australia
Calgary, Canada
Helsinki, Finland
Geneva, Switzerland
Sydney, Australia
Zurich, Switzerland

<p>I&#8217;m finding the Mercer&#8217;s 2009 Quality of Living survey much more useful as it provides a special ranking for hubs with the best infrastructure.  Note that Mercer&#8217; survey is meant to be used as a comparison tool to determine compensation packages for companies with personnel abroad.   Yet, as usual, it is fun to make a list of the cities where you would want to live next, right?</p>
<p>Here are the Top 5 cities in each region, according to the Mercer survey:</p>


Americas
Asia Pacific
Europe
Middle East &#038; Africa


Vancouver
Auckland
Vienna
Dubai


Toronto
Sydney
Zurich
Port Louis


Ottawa
Wellington
 Geneva 
Abu Dhabi


Montreal
Melbourne
 Dusseldorf 
Cape Town


Calgary
Perth
 Munich 
Port Elizabeth


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much has changed since the last time I reported on the <a href="http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/">Liveability report from The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2007</a>.   Vancouver is still the best place to live overall according to the <a href="http://www.economist.com/markets/rankings/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13809770">2009 ranking</a>:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:145%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<li style="font-size:140%">Melbourne, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:135%">Toronto, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:130%">Perth, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:125%">Calgary, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:120%">Helsinki, Finland</li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Geneva, Switzerland</li>
<li style="font-size:110%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Zurich, Switzerland</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m finding the <a href="http://www.mercer.com/qualityofliving">Mercer&#8217;s 2009 Quality of Living survey</a> much more useful as it provides a special ranking for hubs with the best infrastructure.  Note that Mercer&#8217; survey is meant to be used as a comparison tool to determine compensation packages for companies with personnel abroad.   Yet, as usual, it is fun to make a list of the cities where you would want to live next, right?</p>
<p>Here are the Top 5 cities in each region, according to the Mercer survey:</p>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td width="25%">Americas</td>
<td width="25%">Asia Pacific</td>
<td width="25%">Europe</td>
<td width="25%">Middle East &#038; Africa</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Vancouver</td>
<td>Auckland</td>
<td>Vienna</td>
<td>Dubai</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Toronto</td>
<td>Sydney</td>
<td>Zurich</td>
<td>Port Louis</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Ottawa</td>
<td>Wellington</td>
<td> Geneva </td>
<td>Abu Dhabi</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Montreal</td>
<td>Melbourne</td>
<td> Dusseldorf </td>
<td>Cape Town</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Calgary</td>
<td>Perth</td>
<td> Munich </td>
<td>Port Elizabeth</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 hub culture&#8217;s zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buenos aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hong kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we struggle to find ways to survive the current crisis and look at the leaders of the world to provide guidance, the latest Hub Culture 2009 Zeitgeist Ranking will come in handy as a tour of the cities that are better positioned to sustain an acceptable quality of life while providing plenty of opportunities to rebuild for the future.   A zeitgeist reflecting the drama of our times:</p>

Washington,DC
<p>its not really about the Obamas &#8211; its about the context of our changing expectations of government</p>
Berlin
<p>Berliners become an enigma &#8211; povo at home, increasingly affluent abroad</p>
Beijing
<p>Just ignore the noxious skyline as you watch the GDP growth rates, still hovering near 9%</p>
Los Angeles
<p>LA&#8217;s fashion scene has stagnated, and the city&#8217;s hold on entertainment is slipping to diffusion by web 2.0</p>
Tokyo
<p>the principles of kaizen (continuous improvement) are shaping a really cool new Japanese ecovibe</p>
Sydney
<p>The general attitude down under appears to be one of distant concern</p>
Saö Paulo
<p>Here, &#8216;crunch&#8217; is in the quinoa, not in the financial vocabulary</p>
Hong Kong
<p>The city is rich enough to sit out the bust, and it can always rely on China&#8217;s neighboring Guangdong province to drive the local economy</p>
New York
<p>Hunger breeds innovation, because people actually have to think, plot and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we struggle to find ways to survive the current crisis and look at the leaders of the world to provide guidance, the latest <a href="http://www.hubculture.com/groups/hubnews/news/162/">Hub Culture 2009 Zeitgeist Ranking</a> will come in handy as a tour of the cities that are better positioned to sustain an acceptable quality of life while providing plenty of opportunities to rebuild for the future.   A zeitgeist reflecting the drama of our times:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size: 150%">Washington,DC</li>
<blockquote><p>its not really about the Obamas &#8211; its about the context of our changing expectations of government</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 147%">Berlin</li>
<blockquote><p>Berliners become an enigma &#8211; povo at home, increasingly affluent abroad</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 144%">Beijing</li>
<blockquote><p>Just ignore the noxious skyline as you watch the GDP growth rates, still hovering near 9%</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 141%">Los Angeles</li>
<blockquote><p>LA&#8217;s fashion scene has stagnated, and the city&#8217;s hold on entertainment is slipping to diffusion by web 2.0</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 138%">Tokyo</li>
<blockquote><p>the principles of kaizen (continuous improvement) are shaping a really cool new Japanese ecovibe</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 135%">Sydney</li>
<blockquote><p>The general attitude down under appears to be one of distant concern</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 132%">Saö Paulo</li>
<blockquote><p>Here, &#8216;crunch&#8217; is in the quinoa, not in the financial vocabulary</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 129%">Hong Kong</li>
<blockquote><p>The city is rich enough to sit out the bust, and it can always rely on China&#8217;s neighboring Guangdong province to drive the local economy</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 126%">New York</li>
<blockquote><p>Hunger breeds innovation, because people actually have to think, plot and scheme to make a difference, and are more likely to do it on a shoestring budget.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 123%">London</li>
<blockquote><p>With large infrastructure projects on the horizon for the Olympics, nimble currency moves and a general stiff upper lip, the mantra now is survival and sobriety</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 120%">Shanghai</li>
<blockquote><p>China is one of the last places in the world still experiencing growth, and that means that the party is still in progress here on the Huangphu River</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 117%">Mumbai</li>
<blockquote><p>Clearly the November attacks had a large impact on the mood of the city, but they can&#8217;t dent the can-do spirit of average Mumbaikars</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 114%">Singapore</li>
<blockquote><p>Private wealth and trading (two of the city&#8217;s biggest focuses) are giving ground to medical tourism, biotech and other homegrown industries taking root with support from the government</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 111%">Buenos Aires</li>
<blockquote><p>international markets and visitors that provide an international feel to the city began to dry up</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 108%">Dubai</li>
<blockquote><p>Dubai&#8217;s taste for showcases, whether luxury, architecture or design, make the remaining grand opportunities here very interesting</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 105%">Paris</li>
<blockquote><p>The current mood is about refocusing on priorities, living life more simply and thinking deep thoughts.  Where better than Paris?</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 102%">Toronto</li>
<blockquote><p>Canadian globe trotters are heading back home to Canada&#8217;s most influential business city as they check out of their stints abroad.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 99%">Istanbul</li>
<blockquote><p>Looking ahead, the story of Istanbul is about youthful opportunity.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 96%">México, D.F.</li>
<blockquote><p>a young population works in Mexico City&#8217;s favour, creating optimism and opportunity for the future, generated by an increasingly well educated and global population.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 93%">Copenhagen</li>
<blockquote><p>the Danish way of life, from design to food, with a focus on streamlined simplicity, makes more sense than ever.</p></blockquote>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>cities with most twitter users</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caracas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taipei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by TwitterLocal.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:
167830</p>

Tokyo &#8211; 13.5%
New York &#8211; 9.2%
San Francisco &#8211; 6.1%
Los Angeles &#8211; 5.9%
London &#8211; 4.9%
Washington &#8211; 4.1%
Chicago &#8211; 3.9%
Boston &#8211; 3.0%
Seattle &#8211; 3.0%
Sao Paulo &#8211; 2.7%

<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by <a href="http://www.twitterlocal.net/stats">TwitterLocal</a>.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:<br />
167830</p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size:150%">Tokyo &#8211; <abbr title="22,697">13.5%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:130%">New York &#8211; <abbr title="15,410">9.2%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">San Francisco &#8211; <abbr title="10,257">6.1%<abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Los Angeles &#8211; <abbr title="9,941">5.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:110%">London &#8211; <abbr title="8,276">4.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Washington &#8211; <abbr title="6,948">4.1%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Chicago &#8211; <abbr title="6,513">3.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Boston &#8211; <abbr title="5,064">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Seattle &#8211; <abbr title="5,002">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Sao Paulo &#8211; <abbr title="4,457">2.7%</abbr></li>
</ul>
<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>most facebook users per city</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/most-facebook-users-per-city/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/most-facebook-users-per-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hong kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post on accelerating innovation, and after reading a post on Facebook users by country I thought a bit of research was pertinent.  Based on my own survey using Facebook itself, here is a list of some of the cities with the highest percentage of facebook users:</p>

Montreal &#8211; 35.2%
Sydney &#8211; 28.4%
Toronto &#8211; 24.7%
London &#8211; 22%
Hong Kong &#8211; 18.9%
New York &#8211; 17.4%
Singapore &#8211; 14.1%

<p>I had to remove from the list other potential candidates where Facebook didn&#8217;t breakdown their user base by city; cities in northern Europe and South America among them.   Any feedback or inquiries on other cities are welcome.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post on accelerating innovation, and after reading a post on <a href="http://www.nickburcher.com/2008/07/facebook-user-numbers-by-country-and.html">Facebook users by country</a> I thought a bit of research was pertinent.  Based on my own survey using Facebook itself, here is a list of some of the cities with the highest percentage of facebook users:</p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size:130%">Montreal &#8211; <abbr title="1,167,240 / 3,316,615">35.2%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:125%">Sydney &#8211; <abbr title="1,221,780 / 4,297,100">28.4%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:120%">Toronto &#8211; <abbr title="1,361,540 / 5,500,000">24.7%<abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">London &#8211; <abbr title="1,667,460 / 7,581,052">22%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:110%">Hong Kong &#8211; <abbr title="1,319,440 / 6,985,200">18.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">New York &#8211; <abbr title="1,443,520 / 8,274,527">17.4%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Singapore &#8211; <abbr title="683,200 / 4,839,400">14.1%</abbr></li>
</ul>
<p>I had to remove from the list other potential candidates where Facebook didn&#8217;t breakdown their user base by city; cities in northern Europe and South America among them.   Any feedback or inquiries on other cities are welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/most-facebook-users-per-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 most liveable cities</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/2008-most-liveable-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/2008-most-liveable-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fukuoka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honolulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liveability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minneapolis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monocle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I owe a big apology to all my loyal readers for keeping you in the dark over the last 3 months.  Since my last post I travelled to Mexico twice, shared the stage in San Francisco with some of the authorities on the &#8220;geoweb&#8221;, travelled to Corsica, the French Riviera, Lake Como, St. Moritz; and managed to launch PlanetEye.com where I lead the Technology team.  Intense to say the least.  But the most recent issue of Monocle has me burning the proverbial midnight oil and finding energy to start posting regularly again.  Thanks for your comments while I was away.</p>
<p>The Monocle Global Quality of Life Index may one day graduate to adopt a scientific methodology that considers a larger spectrum of cities around the world, but I&#8217;m happy to settle for their current coverage and play the  my-city-is-better-than-yours game, using the tidbits of quick facts they&#8217;ve compiled.   For those who don&#8217;t buy the magazine here are the top 10 cities:</p>

Copenhagen, Denmark
<p>Good looks, brains, perfect proportions, a sunny disposition and a sense of humour are always a winning combination&#8230;</p>
Munich, Germany
<p>It combines a strong economy with rich cultural offerings.  The city&#8217;s workforce is highly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owe a big apology to all my loyal readers for keeping you in the dark over the last 3 months.  Since my last post I travelled to Mexico twice, <a href="http://where.blip.tv/file/969324/">shared the stage</a> in San Francisco with some of the authorities on the &#8220;geoweb&#8221;, travelled to Corsica, the French Riviera, Lake Como, St. Moritz; and managed to launch <a href="http://planeteye.com">PlanetEye.com</a> where I lead the Technology team.  Intense to say the least.  But the most recent issue of Monocle has me burning the proverbial midnight oil and finding energy to start posting regularly again.  Thanks for your comments while I was away.</p>
<p><a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/cover15.jpg"><img align="right" src="http://global-culture.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/cover15.jpg" alt="" title="Monocle Issue 15, Volume 2" width="148" height="196" class="alignright size-full wp-image-243" /></a>The <a href="http://www.monocle.com/Magazine/volume-02/issue-15/">Monocle Global Quality of Life Index</a> may one day graduate to adopt a scientific methodology that considers a larger spectrum of cities around the world, but I&#8217;m happy to settle for their current coverage and play the  <em>my-city-is-better-than-yours</em> game, using the tidbits of quick facts they&#8217;ve compiled.   For those who don&#8217;t buy the magazine here are the top 10 cities:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Copenhagen, Denmark</li>
<blockquote><p>Good looks, brains, perfect proportions, a sunny disposition and a sense of humour are always a winning combination&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:145%">Munich, Germany</li>
<blockquote><p>It combines a strong economy with rich cultural offerings.  The city&#8217;s workforce is highly qualified; its universities world class.   And if the walls start closing in you&#8217;ve got the Alps on your doorstep.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:140%">Tokyo, Japan</li>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; a new generation of well-travelled, job-hopping twenty and thirtysomethings who are changing Tokyo, challenging stereotypes&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:135%">Zürich, Switzerland</li>
<blockquote><p>The city&#8217;s world-class education facilities and cultural offerings, great local public transport and well-connected airport mean it can satisfy even the most demanding employees.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:125%">Helsinki, Finland</li>
<blockquote><p>Waterside revival, civic pride and a view to Asia bode well for the city&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:130%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<blockquote><p>Don&#8217;t be deceived by Vienna&#8217;s apparent bourgeois rectitude&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:125%">Stockholm, Sweden</li>
<blockquote><p>&#8230; with its archipelago, pristine parks and old architecture, is pretty as a princess cake &#8211; the Swedes&#8217; favourite birthday treat.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:120%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<blockquote><p>By accepting increased building density as official city policy, Vancouver believes it is leading the continent in addressing climate change.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:115%">Melbourne, Australia</li>
<blockquote><p>its economy is humming, its arts scene is thriving, and more than 1,000 new people a week are calling the city home.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:110%">Paris, France</li>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;it is setting benchmarks in urbanism that have officials from around the world heading to meet mayor Bertrand Delanoë.</p></blockquote>
</ol>
<p>Sydney, Honolulu, Madrid, Berlin, Barcelona, Montréal, Fukuoka, Amsterdam, Minneapolis, Kyoto, Hamburg, Singapore, Geneva, Lisbon and Portland follow the leaders.</p>
<p>But the ranking is just a great marketing tool.  Much more interesting and relevant to the readers of this blog are the articles &#8220;Thinking cities&#8221; which collects ideas from some of the best recognized urban thinkers; and &#8220;Perfect neighbourhood&#8221;, a redux of their ideal borough dream from last year.  More on this in upcoming posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/2008-most-liveable-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 hub culture&#8217;s zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/2008-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/2008-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buenos aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hong kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/index.php/2008/01/27/2008-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every year Stan Stalnaker and his team of global citizens gather their experiences around the world and summarize in this, their now famous Hub Culture&#8217;s Zeitgeist Ranking, the cities that for a variety of reasons seem to be at the center of the Universe.  An elusive classification that doesn&#8217;t get impressed with economic power, flawless life-styles or centuries-old traditions, is mostly based on heuristics that related to the needs and desires of global citizens hoping from hub to hub networking their way into urban authorities.  This is their veredict:

Los Angeles, United States
<p>In some ways, the doom and gloom LA has experienced recently has presaged the general red alerts now being felt elsewhere &#8211; from environmental crisis to economic lapse, LA seems to have arrived in the shits just before everyone else.</p>
Berlin, Germany
<p>As the cutting edge vibe in London wanes, Berlin continues to draw the young and the restless, and its ties to a resurgent East (i.e. Moscow, Warsaw) are really showing dividends.</p>
Mumbai, India
<p>Even as Mumbai gridlock threatens to become a 24/7 state of affairs, India in general and Mumbai in particular continue their assault on the global consciousness. It&#8217;s hard to argue against Mumbai, especially with so many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year Stan Stalnaker and his team of global citizens gather their experiences around the world and summarize in this, their now famous <a href="http://www.hubculture.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=152&amp;Itemid=44">Hub Culture&#8217;s Zeitgeist Ranking</a>, the cities that for a variety of reasons seem to be at the center of the Universe.  An elusive classification that doesn&#8217;t get impressed with economic power, flawless life-styles or centuries-old traditions, is mostly based on heuristics that related to the needs and desires of global citizens hoping from hub to hub networking their way into urban authorities.  This is their veredict:
<ol>
<li style="font-size: 150%">Los Angeles, United States</li>
<blockquote><p>In some ways, the doom and gloom LA has experienced recently has presaged the general red alerts now being felt elsewhere &#8211; from environmental crisis to economic lapse, LA seems to have arrived in the shits just before everyone else.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 147%">Berlin, Germany</li>
<blockquote><p>As the cutting edge vibe in London wanes, Berlin continues to draw the young and the restless, and its ties to a resurgent East (i.e. Moscow, Warsaw) are really showing dividends.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 144%">Mumbai, India</li>
<blockquote><p>Even as Mumbai gridlock threatens to become a 24/7 state of affairs, India in general and Mumbai in particular continue their assault on the global consciousness. It&#8217;s hard to argue against Mumbai, especially with so many new innovations popping up here. That includes the arrival of the TATA Nano, which will soon change the economics of transport across the developing world.  Add in booming hotels, real estate and a stronger rupee, and Mumbai holds the course.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 141%">Beijing, China</li>
<blockquote><p>2008 is Beijing&#8217;s year, and not just because of the Olympics. The financial meltdown occurring in other capitals has cast Beijing in a new light as the Chinese continue to show fiscal reserve while strengthening their own position.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 138%">Tokyo, Japan</li>
<blockquote><p>Tokyo is steaming!  A combination of low prices, an awakening in the real estate sector, smart yen plays and new innovation in the music scene have breathed new life into Asia&#8217;s sleeping Godzilla.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 135%">London, United Kingdom</li>
<blockquote><p>Overpriced by any measure and past the crest in nightlife, London seems to have dulled in line with the smaller bonuses being handed out in the City.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 132%">Buenos Aires, Argentina</li>
<blockquote><p>BA has problems, but Argentina&#8217;s cheap prices are attracting legions of globalized people, especially financial types looking to make investments in everything from wine to hotels.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 129%">Dubai, U.A.E.</li>
<blockquote><p>Global investment capability and a city awash in cash and construction make Dubai one of the world&#8217;s few economic bright spots in 2008.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 126%">New York, United States</li>
<blockquote><p>While not great for the locals, that makes for a wonderful hub moment in the city: a bargain for visitors and a place more remarkably open and international than it has been for a long time.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 123%">Hong Kong, China</li>
<blockquote><p>The scene remains predictable, but predictably fun, and Hong Kong&#8217;s leadership in fashion and Asian pop culture is steady &#8211; even if everyone is increasingly obsessed with Korean daytime TV.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 120%">Istanbul, Turkey</li>
<blockquote><p>Istanbul has dropped from last year &#8211; not because it is any less hot, just because other locations are now taking up more mind space.  As the Islam threat feels like its cooling Istanbul continues to set the leadership example for the region while integrating ever closer to Europe.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 117%">San Francisco, United States</li>
<blockquote><p>San Francisco continues to punch above its population weight, mostly because it continues to reinvent itself. From the technology space it is now leading the global green charge, spearheading investments and opportunity in the sector.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 114%">Sao Paolo, Brasil</li>
<blockquote><p>Brazil&#8217;s macro success is manifesting in booming design, nightlife, and real estate in South America&#8217;s largest city with a young, increasingly educated, party population.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 111%">Shanghai, China</li>
<blockquote><p>The city has recently blossomed and is now genuinely a fun place to live, filled with interesting people, a cosmo scene and true cultural innovation.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 108%">Moscow, Russia</li>
<blockquote><p>Putin was named TIME&#8217;s Man of the Year for a reason: Moscow continues to grow its sphere of global influence, and instead of saber rattling the new vogue is suitcase rattling: as in suitcases of cash.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 105%">Madrid, Spain</li>
<blockquote><p>Sunny Madrid is benefiting from stability and language. As South America continues to do well, Madrid benefits back in Europe, and a continuing influx of Northern Europeans adds to the cultural mix.  Add in some of the best nightlfe in Europe, a hot art scene and lower living prices than other regional hubs, and Madrid looks ever more enticing.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 102%">Singapore, Singapore</li>
<blockquote><p>Whether stepping up to the financial plate globally or announcing another outlandish designer building project, the tiny city state continues innovation at the macro level, providing economic security and iced whipped chai for its people in an ever more turbulent world.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 99%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<blockquote><p>Sydney is the terrycloth towel of urban hubs &#8211; rich, beautiful and soft enough to feel comfortable.  In a land aloft in buoyant commodity prices and closer ties with the economic engines of Asia, some would argue Sydney never had it so good.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 96%">Mexico City, Mexico</li>
<blockquote><p>The worlds largest city remains a study in contrasts, but times are so good that Mexican immigrants are even returning from California to seek opportunity in Mexico City.  The city elite are still preoccupied with gringonomics to the north, but local growth and development auger well.  Add in the city&#8217;s super young vibe, and one gets the feeling anything is possible.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 93%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<blockquote><p>Vancouver gets this year&#8217;s wild card, in the spirit of No. 10 Geneva last year.  A combination of factors are benefiting this coastal hub, ranging from preparations for the 2010 Winter Games in nearby Whistler to an avalanche of business in the film industry on the heels of LA woes.  Clean and pristine, Vancouver sums up the new environmental feel, and that strong Canadian dollar has Vancouver strutting its stuff in a newly confident way, from Seattle all the way to Shanghai.</p></blockquote>
</ol>
<p>A year is a long time and many cities have fought battles for the attention of this elite crowd.  Take a look at the now obsolete <a href="http://www.hubculture.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=74&amp;Itemid=44">2007 ranking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/2008-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the economist on liveability</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adelaide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/08/23/the-economist-on-liveability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure is not because Monocle released their most liveable cities report just a month ago, but now is The Economist releasing their Liveability rankings with the article Where the grass is greener.   While Monocle&#8217;s report came in the form of a wonderful edition, perfectly written and documented, the Economist Intelligence Unit barely delivers a table with the rankings without much analysis behind.   True, Monocle used criteria such &#8220;fair balance of sunny and warm days&#8221; and &#8220;availability of drinks after hours&#8221;, but the overall delivery convinced.  According to The Economist
 The survey takes over 40 factors into consideration which are weighted across five different categories: Stability; Healthcare; Culture &#038; Environment; Education; and Infrastructure. Across the survey a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data are used, which are combined to give an overall Quality of Life Index rating. </p>
<p>.
However I wasn&#8217;t able to find such factors anywhere, not even after paying for the full report.   Anyway, this are the top 10 according to them, nothing that we haven&#8217;t seen before:</p>

Vancouver, Canada
Melbourne, Australia
Vienna, Austria
Perth, Australia
Toronto, Canada
Adelaide, Australia
Sydney, Australia
Copenhagen, Denmark
Geneva, Switzerland
Zurich, Switzerland

<p>Still, I never get tired of ranking cities and feeling a bit proud on behalf [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure is not because Monocle released their <a href="the http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/07/30/most-liveable-cities/">most liveable cities</a> report just a month ago, but now is The Economist releasing their Liveability rankings with the article <a href="http://economist.com/markets/rankings/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8908454&#038;CFID=16415879&#038;CFTOKEN=94552766">Where the grass is greener</a>.   While <a href="http://monocle.com/Magazine/volume-01/issue-05/">Monocle&#8217;s report</a> came in the form of a wonderful edition, perfectly written and documented, the Economist Intelligence Unit barely delivers a table with the rankings without much analysis behind.   True, Monocle used criteria such &#8220;fair balance of sunny and warm days&#8221; and &#8220;availability of drinks after hours&#8221;, but the overall delivery convinced.  According to The Economist<br />
<blockquote> The survey takes over 40 factors into consideration which are weighted across five different categories: Stability; Healthcare; Culture &#038; Environment; Education; and Infrastructure. Across the survey a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data are used, which are combined to give an overall Quality of Life Index rating. </p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
However I wasn&#8217;t able to find such factors anywhere, not even after paying for the full report.   Anyway, this are the top 10 according to them, nothing that we haven&#8217;t seen before:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:145%">Melbourne, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:140%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<li style="font-size:135%">Perth, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:130%">Toronto, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:125%">Adelaide, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:120%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Copenhagen, Denmark</li>
<li style="font-size:110%">Geneva, Switzerland</li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Zurich, Switzerland</li>
</ol>
<p>Still, I never get tired of ranking cities and feeling a bit proud on behalf of those cities that I&#8217;ve come to know one way or another.</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: after corresponding with the Editor of the report at the Economist Intelligence Unit I was given access to the full report which documents their methodology.   The ranking is based on 5 categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>Stability (25%): crime, conflict</li>
<li>Healthcare (20%): private &#038; public healthcare</li>
<li>Culture &#038; Environment (25%): weather, freedoms, culture, food, goods</li>
<li>Education (10%): private &#038; public education</li>
<li>Infrastructure (20%): public transportation, international connections, housing, services, telecomminications</li>
</ul>
<p>As suspected, their analysis is far more methodic but is intended to help companies planning to expand make decisions about how to compensate workers being transferred.</p>
<p>The survey was conducted in June 2007 so if you&#8217;re curious about the ranking of your city, send me a note and I&#8217;ll share the data. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>most liveable cities</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/most-liveable-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/most-liveable-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 02:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auckland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honolulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kyoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/07/30/most-liveable-cities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hyper-connected to the rest of the world through an ample offering of long-haul flights, low crime rates, great education and health system, fair balance of sunny and warm days, plenty of ways to stay informed, availability of drinks after hours, good public transit, lots of green areas and a will to keep them green.   This is the method behind the first Monocle Quality of Life Index.
For international flight connections it would be Paris but for an airport it would have to be Munich.  On crime it would be a Japanese city &#8211; either Tokyo or Kyoto would do.  Zürich and Helsinki would be our key contributors for hospitals and schools while Sydney and Honolulu offer the best weather.   [...]  For a good night out we&#8217;d want to be resident in Madrid, Tokyo or Barcelona and for getting home we&#8217;d opt for Munich&#8217;s public transport and Copenhagen&#8217;s bike network if we were sober enough to pedal home ourselves.</p>
<p>With a well documented rating behind each one of the cities in the list, it is going to be hard to argue that they&#8217;ve done their homework, but it still feels very subjective.  In any case, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hyper-connected to the rest of the world through an ample offering of long-haul flights, low crime rates, great education and health system, fair balance of sunny and warm days, plenty of ways to stay informed, availability of drinks after hours, good public transit, lots of green areas and a will to keep them green.   This is the method behind the first <a href="http://monocle.com/Magazine/volume-01/issue-05/">Monocle</a> Quality of Life Index.<br />
<blockquote>For international flight connections it would be Paris but for an airport it would have to be Munich.  On crime it would be a Japanese city &#8211; either Tokyo or Kyoto would do.  Zürich and Helsinki would be our key contributors for hospitals and schools while Sydney and Honolulu offer the best weather.   [...]  For a good night out we&#8217;d want to be resident in Madrid, Tokyo or Barcelona and for getting home we&#8217;d opt for Munich&#8217;s public transport and Copenhagen&#8217;s bike network if we were sober enough to pedal home ourselves.</p></blockquote>
<p>With a well documented rating behind each one of the cities in the list, it is going to be hard to argue that they&#8217;ve done their homework, but it still feels very subjective.  In any case, kudos to the top 10 cities:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Munich, Germany</li>
<blockquote><p>A winning combination of investment in infrastructure, high-quality housing, low crime, liberal politics, strong media and general feeling of Gem√ºtlichkeit make it a city that should inspire others.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:145%">Copenhagen, Denmark</li>
<blockquote><p>There&#8217;s no shame coming second, particularly when phase two of your new metro is about to go live, your airport is a joy, you can bike safely through the city and you have so many stunning residents.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:140%">Zürich, Switzerland</li>
<blockquote><p>for being one of the best-connected, best endowed, safest and easiest to navigate cities in the world [...] run one of the most high-frequency public transports networks in the world and boast a bathing culture that sees the trimmest bodies at Bank Julius Bar strip off at lunch for a cooling plunge in tis mountain-water-fed lake.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:135%">Tokyo, Japan</li>
<blockquote><p>Integrated transport, breathtaking technology, great service and the best bars make this our top big city.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:130%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<blockquote><p>famous for its rich cultural heritage, also has a progressive eco-friendly municipal government.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:125%">Helsinki, Finland</li>
<blockquote><p>What&#8217;s lost in the winter darkness is replaced by great cultural and sporting outlets, Stockmann&#8217;s bookstore and a good music scene.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:120%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<blockquote><p>The city has some environmental issues and an antiquated trasnport system.  But then there&#8217;s the beach&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:115%">Stockholm, Sweden</li>
<blockquote><p>An eye for detail, good street style and strong public services make this a pleasant place to build a nest.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:110%">Honolulu, United States</li>
<blockquote><p>Bridging the oceanic gap between California and Asia, Honolulu now fits the definition of a global city &#8211; a palm-fringed metropolis with a population as diverse as its flora.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size:105%">Madrid, Spain</li>
<blockquote><p>Red tape and poor infrastructure are counterbalanced by cultural vibrancy and a 24-hour lifestyle</p></blockquote>
</ol>
<p>Melbourne, Montreal, Barcelona, Kyoto, Vancouver, Auckland, Singapore, Hamburg, Paris &#038; Geneva follow the leaders with their own advantages in this ranking, which along the rest of the magazine does a lot to uncover great urban experiences.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/category/statistics/">other rankings</a> that measure cities against each other and Monocle&#8217;s approach is certainly interesting but with the growing global awareness many of the advantages that some of these cities hold will soon be replicated and enjoyed in tandem by citizens of most global cities.   Perhaps it is the article Good Hood found in the pages that follow the ranking that offers a greater insight as to what makes a true liveable city:  plenty of neighborhoods with the diversity and vibrancy to keep their inhabitants satisfied with a range of local world-class services.  For all other goods of life you can always aspire to your next adventure abroad.</p>
<p><i>Thanks to <a href="http://aonb.blogspot.com/">Slava</a> for recommending the magazine.  It is a great discovery.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/most-liveable-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the economist on cities (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-cities-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-cities-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 15:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auckland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dusseldorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frankfurt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/05/08/the-economist-on-cities-part-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the annotation of the special report on cities by The Economist.  If you haven&#8217;t, please read part 1 first.

Failures at the top: concludes that the single most important factor contributing to the success of a modern city is its government.  All great cities, or cities that have gone through important renewal were characterized by influential thinkers taking the lead with passion.
In the 1980s Chicago lost companies, jobs and people, and seemed destined to languish in gradual decline in much the same way as Cleveland, Detroit and Pittsburgh.  But energetic government led by a mayor, Richard Daley, whose ambitions start and end with his home town, has truned the city round.</p>
<p>My post on big city refers to the efforts of Mayors in some of the largest cities around the world, but I believe in the ability of the common citizen to commit her energy to improving our city life.  If you don&#8217;t believe it, just check the manifesto for global cities in which I account of a small group of bloggers in Pittsburgh contributing great ideas to turn their city round.
In place of God: explores the soul of a city, an elusive concept that some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the annotation of the <a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9070726">special report on cities by The Economist</a>.  If you haven&#8217;t, please <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/05/07/the-economist-on-cities-part-1/">read part 1</a> first.
<ul>
<li><b><a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_JDSDGRN">Failures at the top</a></b>: concludes that the single most important factor contributing to the success of a modern city is its government.  All great cities, or cities that have gone through important renewal were characterized by influential thinkers taking the lead with passion.<br />
<blockquote>In the 1980s Chicago lost companies, jobs and people, and seemed destined to languish in gradual decline in much the same way as Cleveland, Detroit and Pittsburgh.  But energetic government led by a mayor, Richard Daley, whose ambitions start and end with his home town, has truned the city round.</p></blockquote>
<p>My post on <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/02/08/big-city/">big city</a> refers to the efforts of Mayors in some of the largest cities around the world, but I believe in the ability of the common citizen to commit her energy to improving our city life.  If you don&#8217;t believe it, just check the <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/04/17/manifesto-for-global-cities/">manifesto for global cities</a> in which I account of a small group of bloggers in Pittsburgh contributing great ideas to turn their city round.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_JDSDGSP">In place of God</a></b>: explores the soul of a city, an elusive concept that some refer as its culture.  An important renaissance is taking place across some of the largest cities driven by the rebirth of their cultural institutions and a new emphasis on developing city cores as opposed to endless sprawl.  One thing is certain: many cities around the world are converging into a life style that seems perfect for a few players.  <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2006/10/16/the-idle-class/">The idle class</a> talks about the all-too-comfortable life style that so many aspire to reach and that contributes very little to develop society beyond its ability to consume.  Definitely one of the important ideas of this blog.<br />
Also, checkout the <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/01/05/2007-citygeist/">2007 citygeist</a> for a fun look at what some of the most cosmopolitan cities are doing to renew their soul.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_JDSDGGP">The reinvention test</a></b>:  the top ten cities in 2006 were <b>Zurich &#038; Geneva</b> (Switzerland), <b>Vancouver</b> (Canada), <b>Vienna</b> (Austria), <b>Auckland</b> (New Zealand), <b>Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Munich</b> (Germany), <b>Bern</b> (Switzerland) and <b>Sydney</b> (Australia).  But I have explored other methods to determine the degree to which a nation succeeds through its influence in world affairs, leading to a different ranking: check it out in <a href="/blog/2007/01/27/airports-tourists/">airports &#038; tourists</a>.</li>
<li><b><a href="http://www.economist.com/surveys/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_JDSDGPN">Et in suburbia ego?</a></b>: presents the debate between suburbia and downtown with equal amount of critics claiming each one will prevail.  If anything the debate on Global Warming has tipped the scales in favour of city cores, but perhaps the more important argument yet to be recognized in the evolution of global cities is the fact that their growth will be powered by a legion of immigrants with limited resources (see <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2006/09/27/the-south-in-the-hearth-of-the-north/">the south in the hearth of the north</a>) and while they would gladly buy a small apartment downtown or settle in a nice community in the suburbs the fact is that most of them get trapped in the <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/04/23/slums-of-hope/">slums of hope</a>.  These often neglected areas contribute to the growth of cities in a very important way and yet are out of control.  There is no stopping the ongoing migration that makes them grow, but only smart cities will find a way to integrate these people in the economic life and build flourishing corridors abundant with life and hope.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-cities-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
