<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Culture &#187; sao paulo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://global-culture.org/destinations/sao-paulo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://global-culture.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable, Memorable, Livable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>emerging destination index</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budapest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buenos aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kuala lumpur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warsaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Using the Emerging Markets Index released by Mastercard back in October, I&#8217;ve created something I&#8217;m going to call the Emerging Destination Index as a tool to provide clues as to which non-traditional tourist destinations may provide the fundamental infrastructure to sustain the type of travellers that I&#8217;ve been discussing over the last little while in this blog.   </p>
<p>The original index data is available from Mastercard, and all I did was to reconfigure the weights assigned by the original methodology to assign more value to those dimensions that have a higher impact on the ability of a traveller to operate remotely from the region with fair access to a urban standard of living.   These are the weights I assigned:</p>

Economic and Commercial Environment (0%) &#8211; Used in the original index to measure time and costs for building a standard warehouse, registering a property, exporting/importing cargo, and rate corruption and foreign bond, it seemed mostly irrelevant for the purpose of this index, so I left it out.
Economic Growth and Development (10%) &#8211; Measuring the broad economic health and growth of the national economy this dimension seems to be the best way of describing the level of infrastructure that will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/studies/2008/emi/index.html">Emerging Markets Index</a> <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/pdfs/2008/MCWW_EMI_Global_Launch_Release.pdf">released by Mastercard</a> back in October, I&#8217;ve created something I&#8217;m going to call the Emerging Destination Index as a tool to provide clues as to which non-traditional tourist destinations may provide the fundamental infrastructure to sustain the type of travellers that I&#8217;ve been discussing over the last little while in this blog.   </p>
<p>The original <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/studies/2008/emi/indexchart.html">index data is available</a> from Mastercard, and all I did was to reconfigure the weights assigned by the original methodology to assign more value to those dimensions that have a higher impact on the ability of a traveller to operate remotely from the region with fair access to a urban standard of living.   These are the weights I assigned:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Economic and Commercial Environment (0%)</strong> &#8211; Used in the original index to measure time and costs for building a standard warehouse, registering a property, exporting/importing cargo, and rate corruption and foreign bond, it seemed mostly irrelevant for the purpose of this index, so I left it out.</li>
<li><strong>Economic Growth and Development (10%)</strong> &#8211; Measuring the broad economic health and growth of the national economy this dimension seems to be the best way of describing the level of infrastructure that will ultimately support most activities from those visiting.   It will also likely be related to the level scope of urban areas and the availability of important infrastructure outside of the major cities.</li>
<li><strong>Business Environment (7%) </strong>- Reflects the ability to setup a business.  After all in order for travellers to gain access to the region, business must prosper along with all their suppliers, just so the visitors can enjoy their stay with a guarantee of fundamental services.</li>
<li><strong>Financial Services Environment (6%)</strong> &#8211; The availability of financial services to sustain the traveller during the stay.</li>
<li><strong>Commercial Connectivity (16%)</strong> &#8211; While I made the point that no place on Earth is remote anymore, this dimension measures city connectivity to other world and regional commercial centers by air, airline passenger volumes, presence of foreign consulates/embassies, international hotels, convention/meeting facilities, and international trade.</li>
<li><strong>Education, and IT Connectivity Environment (12%)</strong> &#8211; The availability of basic IT infrastructure may be key for those trying to maintain their links to work life active while on the region.</li>
<li><strong>Quality of Urban Life (28%)</strong> &#8211; Measures the quality of life by considering: personal freedom/media and censorship, medical and health considerations, public services and transport, recreation and culture, mortality, and the presence of world heritage sites.   For someone looking to make a trip to a region for a few weeks, this dimension alone provides the most important aspect of the index on whether the visit will be full of memorable experiences.</li>
<li><strong>Risk &#038; Security (21%)</strong> &#8211; Gauges a city’s overall risk and security through personal freedom, personal physical safety and the political and social environment.  A concern in most emerging regions continues to be personal security and while a destination may be inviting, venturing outside of the usual tourist destinations will require the region to provide a basic safety guarantee.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here are the top 10 destinations according to this index:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size: 135%">Shanghai</li>
<li style="font-size: 130%">Budapest</li>
<li style="font-size: 125%">Warsaw</li>
<li style="font-size: 120%">Beijing</li>
<li style="font-size: 115%">Buenos Aires</li>
<li style="font-size: 110%">Kuala Lumpur</li>
<li style="font-size: 105%">Sao Paulo</li>
<li style="font-size: 100%">Santiago</li>
<li style="font-size: 95%">Mexico City</li>
<li style="font-size: 90%">Bangkok</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ll be happy to share the full list of 65 with anyone that is interested.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 hub culture&#8217;s zeitgeist</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buenos aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hong kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we struggle to find ways to survive the current crisis and look at the leaders of the world to provide guidance, the latest Hub Culture 2009 Zeitgeist Ranking will come in handy as a tour of the cities that are better positioned to sustain an acceptable quality of life while providing plenty of opportunities to rebuild for the future.   A zeitgeist reflecting the drama of our times:</p>

Washington,DC
<p>its not really about the Obamas &#8211; its about the context of our changing expectations of government</p>
Berlin
<p>Berliners become an enigma &#8211; povo at home, increasingly affluent abroad</p>
Beijing
<p>Just ignore the noxious skyline as you watch the GDP growth rates, still hovering near 9%</p>
Los Angeles
<p>LA&#8217;s fashion scene has stagnated, and the city&#8217;s hold on entertainment is slipping to diffusion by web 2.0</p>
Tokyo
<p>the principles of kaizen (continuous improvement) are shaping a really cool new Japanese ecovibe</p>
Sydney
<p>The general attitude down under appears to be one of distant concern</p>
Saö Paulo
<p>Here, &#8216;crunch&#8217; is in the quinoa, not in the financial vocabulary</p>
Hong Kong
<p>The city is rich enough to sit out the bust, and it can always rely on China&#8217;s neighboring Guangdong province to drive the local economy</p>
New York
<p>Hunger breeds innovation, because people actually have to think, plot and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we struggle to find ways to survive the current crisis and look at the leaders of the world to provide guidance, the latest <a href="http://www.hubculture.com/groups/hubnews/news/162/">Hub Culture 2009 Zeitgeist Ranking</a> will come in handy as a tour of the cities that are better positioned to sustain an acceptable quality of life while providing plenty of opportunities to rebuild for the future.   A zeitgeist reflecting the drama of our times:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size: 150%">Washington,DC</li>
<blockquote><p>its not really about the Obamas &#8211; its about the context of our changing expectations of government</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 147%">Berlin</li>
<blockquote><p>Berliners become an enigma &#8211; povo at home, increasingly affluent abroad</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 144%">Beijing</li>
<blockquote><p>Just ignore the noxious skyline as you watch the GDP growth rates, still hovering near 9%</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 141%">Los Angeles</li>
<blockquote><p>LA&#8217;s fashion scene has stagnated, and the city&#8217;s hold on entertainment is slipping to diffusion by web 2.0</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 138%">Tokyo</li>
<blockquote><p>the principles of kaizen (continuous improvement) are shaping a really cool new Japanese ecovibe</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 135%">Sydney</li>
<blockquote><p>The general attitude down under appears to be one of distant concern</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 132%">Saö Paulo</li>
<blockquote><p>Here, &#8216;crunch&#8217; is in the quinoa, not in the financial vocabulary</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 129%">Hong Kong</li>
<blockquote><p>The city is rich enough to sit out the bust, and it can always rely on China&#8217;s neighboring Guangdong province to drive the local economy</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 126%">New York</li>
<blockquote><p>Hunger breeds innovation, because people actually have to think, plot and scheme to make a difference, and are more likely to do it on a shoestring budget.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 123%">London</li>
<blockquote><p>With large infrastructure projects on the horizon for the Olympics, nimble currency moves and a general stiff upper lip, the mantra now is survival and sobriety</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 120%">Shanghai</li>
<blockquote><p>China is one of the last places in the world still experiencing growth, and that means that the party is still in progress here on the Huangphu River</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 117%">Mumbai</li>
<blockquote><p>Clearly the November attacks had a large impact on the mood of the city, but they can&#8217;t dent the can-do spirit of average Mumbaikars</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 114%">Singapore</li>
<blockquote><p>Private wealth and trading (two of the city&#8217;s biggest focuses) are giving ground to medical tourism, biotech and other homegrown industries taking root with support from the government</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 111%">Buenos Aires</li>
<blockquote><p>international markets and visitors that provide an international feel to the city began to dry up</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 108%">Dubai</li>
<blockquote><p>Dubai&#8217;s taste for showcases, whether luxury, architecture or design, make the remaining grand opportunities here very interesting</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 105%">Paris</li>
<blockquote><p>The current mood is about refocusing on priorities, living life more simply and thinking deep thoughts.  Where better than Paris?</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 102%">Toronto</li>
<blockquote><p>Canadian globe trotters are heading back home to Canada&#8217;s most influential business city as they check out of their stints abroad.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 99%">Istanbul</li>
<blockquote><p>Looking ahead, the story of Istanbul is about youthful opportunity.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 96%">México, D.F.</li>
<blockquote><p>a young population works in Mexico City&#8217;s favour, creating optimism and opportunity for the future, generated by an increasingly well educated and global population.</p></blockquote>
<li style="font-size: 93%">Copenhagen</li>
<blockquote><p>the Danish way of life, from design to food, with a focus on streamlined simplicity, makes more sense than ever.</p></blockquote>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/2009-hub-cultures-zeitgeist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>cities with most twitter users</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caracas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taipei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by TwitterLocal.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:
167830</p>

Tokyo &#8211; 13.5%
New York &#8211; 9.2%
San Francisco &#8211; 6.1%
Los Angeles &#8211; 5.9%
London &#8211; 4.9%
Washington &#8211; 4.1%
Chicago &#8211; 3.9%
Boston &#8211; 3.0%
Seattle &#8211; 3.0%
Sao Paulo &#8211; 2.7%

<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by <a href="http://www.twitterlocal.net/stats">TwitterLocal</a>.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:<br />
167830</p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size:150%">Tokyo &#8211; <abbr title="22,697">13.5%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:130%">New York &#8211; <abbr title="15,410">9.2%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">San Francisco &#8211; <abbr title="10,257">6.1%<abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Los Angeles &#8211; <abbr title="9,941">5.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:110%">London &#8211; <abbr title="8,276">4.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Washington &#8211; <abbr title="6,948">4.1%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Chicago &#8211; <abbr title="6,513">3.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Boston &#8211; <abbr title="5,064">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Seattle &#8211; <abbr title="5,002">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Sao Paulo &#8211; <abbr title="4,457">2.7%</abbr></li>
</ul>
<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>c40 climate summit</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addis ababa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cairo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakarta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lagos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seoul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warsaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/05/13/c40-climate-summit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Next week the Mayors from 40 of the world&#8217;s largest cities will gather in New York to review progress, share best practices, identify collaboration opportunities and set action plans to fight climate change.   The C40 Large Cities Climate Summit program will include topics such as Beating Congestion, Decentralized Energy, Efficient Water Supply, Climate Change in the context of Economic Development, Green Buildings, Waste Management &#038; Low Carbon Economies.  </p>
<p>In big city I had pointed out how the action of the largest cities is what really matters when dealing with global problems.  10% of the world&#8217;s population live in 100 of the largest cities alone.  Through management of their infrastructure, landfills, treatment plans, legislation of local land use policies to drive development in the right direction, regulation of automobiles and their energy plants, the overall impact they can exercise is significant.</p>
<p>The delegates attending will represent (bold indicates among 10 largest cities in the world):</p>
<p>Melbourne, Sydney (Australia)
Dhaka (Bangladesh)
Curitiba, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo (Brazil)
Toronto (Canada)
Beijing, Shanghai (China)
Bogota (Colombia)
Copenhagen (Denmark)
Cairo (Egypt)
Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)
Paris (France)
Berlin (Germany)
Delhi, Mumbai (India)
Jakarta (Indonesia)
Rome (Italy)
Tokyo (Japan)
Mexico City (Mexico)
Rotterdam (Netherlands)
Lagos (Nigeria)
Karachi (Pakistan)
Lima (Peru)
Warsaw (Poland)
Moscow (Russia)
Johannesburg (South Africa)
Seoul (South Korea)
Barcelona, Madrid (Spain)
Stockholm (Sweden)
Bangkok (Thailand)
Istanbul (Turkey)
London (United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next week the Mayors from 40 of the world&#8217;s largest cities will gather in New York to review progress, share best practices, identify collaboration opportunities and set action plans to fight climate change.   The <a href="http://www.nycclimatesummit.com/">C40 Large Cities Climate Summit</a> program will include topics such as Beating Congestion, Decentralized Energy, Efficient Water Supply, Climate Change in the context of Economic Development, Green Buildings, Waste Management &#038; Low Carbon Economies.  </p>
<p>In <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/02/08/big-city/">big city</a> I had pointed out how the action of the largest cities is what really matters when dealing with global problems.  10% of the world&#8217;s population live in 100 of the largest cities alone.  Through management of their infrastructure, landfills, treatment plans, legislation of local land use policies to drive development in the right direction, regulation of automobiles and their energy plants, the overall impact they can exercise is significant.</p>
<p>The delegates attending will represent (<b>bold</b> indicates among 10 largest cities in the world):</p>
<p>Melbourne, Sydney (Australia)<br />
<b>Dhaka</b> (Bangladesh)<br />
Curitiba, Rio de Janeiro, <b>Sao Paulo</b> (Brazil)<br />
Toronto (Canada)<br />
Beijing, Shanghai (China)<br />
Bogota (Colombia)<br />
Copenhagen (Denmark)<br />
Cairo (Egypt)<br />
Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)<br />
Paris (France)<br />
Berlin (Germany)<br />
<b>Delhi, Mumbai</b> (India)<br />
<b>Jakarta</b> (Indonesia)<br />
Rome (Italy)<br />
<b>Tokyo</b> (Japan)<br />
<b>Mexico City</b> (Mexico)<br />
Rotterdam (Netherlands)<br />
Lagos (Nigeria)<br />
Karachi (Pakistan)<br />
Lima (Peru)<br />
Warsaw (Poland)<br />
Moscow (Russia)<br />
Johannesburg (South Africa)<br />
Seoul (South Korea)<br />
Barcelona, Madrid (Spain)<br />
Stockholm (Sweden)<br />
Bangkok (Thailand)<br />
Istanbul (Turkey)<br />
London (United Kingdom)<br />
Austin, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New Orleans, <b>New York</b>, Philadelphia, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland (United States)</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong>   Mayor David Miller of Toronto is now chair of the <a href="http://www.c40cities.org/">C40</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

