<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Culture &#187; perth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://global-culture.org/destinations/perth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://global-culture.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable, Memorable, Livable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>liveability rankings 2009</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ALL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abu dhabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auckland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cape town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dubai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dusseldorf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helsinki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port elizabeth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[port louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Not much has changed since the last time I reported on the Liveability report from The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2007.   Vancouver is still the best place to live overall according to the 2009 ranking:</p>

Vancouver, Canada
Vienna, Austria
Melbourne, Australia
Toronto, Canada
Perth, Australia
Calgary, Canada
Helsinki, Finland
Geneva, Switzerland
Sydney, Australia
Zurich, Switzerland

<p>I&#8217;m finding the Mercer&#8217;s 2009 Quality of Living survey much more useful as it provides a special ranking for hubs with the best infrastructure.  Note that Mercer&#8217; survey is meant to be used as a comparison tool to determine compensation packages for companies with personnel abroad.   Yet, as usual, it is fun to make a list of the cities where you would want to live next, right?</p>
<p>Here are the Top 5 cities in each region, according to the Mercer survey:</p>


Americas
Asia Pacific
Europe
Middle East &#038; Africa


Vancouver
Auckland
Vienna
Dubai


Toronto
Sydney
Zurich
Port Louis


Ottawa
Wellington
 Geneva 
Abu Dhabi


Montreal
Melbourne
 Dusseldorf 
Cape Town


Calgary
Perth
 Munich 
Port Elizabeth


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much has changed since the last time I reported on the <a href="http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/">Liveability report from The Economist Intelligence Unit in 2007</a>.   Vancouver is still the best place to live overall according to the <a href="http://www.economist.com/markets/rankings/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13809770">2009 ranking</a>:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:145%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<li style="font-size:140%">Melbourne, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:135%">Toronto, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:130%">Perth, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:125%">Calgary, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:120%">Helsinki, Finland</li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Geneva, Switzerland</li>
<li style="font-size:110%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Zurich, Switzerland</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m finding the <a href="http://www.mercer.com/qualityofliving">Mercer&#8217;s 2009 Quality of Living survey</a> much more useful as it provides a special ranking for hubs with the best infrastructure.  Note that Mercer&#8217; survey is meant to be used as a comparison tool to determine compensation packages for companies with personnel abroad.   Yet, as usual, it is fun to make a list of the cities where you would want to live next, right?</p>
<p>Here are the Top 5 cities in each region, according to the Mercer survey:</p>
<table border="1">
<tr>
<td width="25%">Americas</td>
<td width="25%">Asia Pacific</td>
<td width="25%">Europe</td>
<td width="25%">Middle East &#038; Africa</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Vancouver</td>
<td>Auckland</td>
<td>Vienna</td>
<td>Dubai</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Toronto</td>
<td>Sydney</td>
<td>Zurich</td>
<td>Port Louis</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Ottawa</td>
<td>Wellington</td>
<td> Geneva </td>
<td>Abu Dhabi</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Montreal</td>
<td>Melbourne</td>
<td> Dusseldorf </td>
<td>Cape Town</td>
</tr>
<tr style="font-size:90%">
<td>Calgary</td>
<td>Perth</td>
<td> Munich </td>
<td>Port Elizabeth</td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/liveability-rankings-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>the economist on liveability</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adelaide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geneva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/08/23/the-economist-on-liveability/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure is not because Monocle released their most liveable cities report just a month ago, but now is The Economist releasing their Liveability rankings with the article Where the grass is greener.   While Monocle&#8217;s report came in the form of a wonderful edition, perfectly written and documented, the Economist Intelligence Unit barely delivers a table with the rankings without much analysis behind.   True, Monocle used criteria such &#8220;fair balance of sunny and warm days&#8221; and &#8220;availability of drinks after hours&#8221;, but the overall delivery convinced.  According to The Economist
 The survey takes over 40 factors into consideration which are weighted across five different categories: Stability; Healthcare; Culture &#038; Environment; Education; and Infrastructure. Across the survey a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data are used, which are combined to give an overall Quality of Life Index rating. </p>
<p>.
However I wasn&#8217;t able to find such factors anywhere, not even after paying for the full report.   Anyway, this are the top 10 according to them, nothing that we haven&#8217;t seen before:</p>

Vancouver, Canada
Melbourne, Australia
Vienna, Austria
Perth, Australia
Toronto, Canada
Adelaide, Australia
Sydney, Australia
Copenhagen, Denmark
Geneva, Switzerland
Zurich, Switzerland

<p>Still, I never get tired of ranking cities and feeling a bit proud on behalf [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure is not because Monocle released their <a href="the http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/07/30/most-liveable-cities/">most liveable cities</a> report just a month ago, but now is The Economist releasing their Liveability rankings with the article <a href="http://economist.com/markets/rankings/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8908454&#038;CFID=16415879&#038;CFTOKEN=94552766">Where the grass is greener</a>.   While <a href="http://monocle.com/Magazine/volume-01/issue-05/">Monocle&#8217;s report</a> came in the form of a wonderful edition, perfectly written and documented, the Economist Intelligence Unit barely delivers a table with the rankings without much analysis behind.   True, Monocle used criteria such &#8220;fair balance of sunny and warm days&#8221; and &#8220;availability of drinks after hours&#8221;, but the overall delivery convinced.  According to The Economist<br />
<blockquote> The survey takes over 40 factors into consideration which are weighted across five different categories: Stability; Healthcare; Culture &#038; Environment; Education; and Infrastructure. Across the survey a mixture of quantitative and qualitative data are used, which are combined to give an overall Quality of Life Index rating. </p></blockquote>
<p>.<br />
However I wasn&#8217;t able to find such factors anywhere, not even after paying for the full report.   Anyway, this are the top 10 according to them, nothing that we haven&#8217;t seen before:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size:150%">Vancouver, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:145%">Melbourne, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:140%">Vienna, Austria</li>
<li style="font-size:135%">Perth, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:130%">Toronto, Canada</li>
<li style="font-size:125%">Adelaide, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:120%">Sydney, Australia</li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Copenhagen, Denmark</li>
<li style="font-size:110%">Geneva, Switzerland</li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Zurich, Switzerland</li>
</ol>
<p>Still, I never get tired of ranking cities and feeling a bit proud on behalf of those cities that I&#8217;ve come to know one way or another.</p>
<p><b>Update</b>: after corresponding with the Editor of the report at the Economist Intelligence Unit I was given access to the full report which documents their methodology.   The ranking is based on 5 categories:</p>
<ul>
<li>Stability (25%): crime, conflict</li>
<li>Healthcare (20%): private &#038; public healthcare</li>
<li>Culture &#038; Environment (25%): weather, freedoms, culture, food, goods</li>
<li>Education (10%): private &#038; public education</li>
<li>Infrastructure (20%): public transportation, international connections, housing, services, telecomminications</li>
</ul>
<p>As suspected, their analysis is far more methodic but is intended to help companies planning to expand make decisions about how to compensate workers being transferred.</p>
<p>The survey was conducted in June 2007 so if you&#8217;re curious about the ranking of your city, send me a note and I&#8217;ll share the data. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/the-economist-on-liveability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

