<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Global Culture &#187; bangkok</title>
	<atom:link href="http://global-culture.org/destinations/bangkok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://global-culture.org</link>
	<description>Sustainable, Memorable, Livable</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>emerging destination index</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Citizen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budapest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buenos aires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kuala lumpur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shanghai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warsaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Using the Emerging Markets Index released by Mastercard back in October, I&#8217;ve created something I&#8217;m going to call the Emerging Destination Index as a tool to provide clues as to which non-traditional tourist destinations may provide the fundamental infrastructure to sustain the type of travellers that I&#8217;ve been discussing over the last little while in this blog.   </p>
<p>The original index data is available from Mastercard, and all I did was to reconfigure the weights assigned by the original methodology to assign more value to those dimensions that have a higher impact on the ability of a traveller to operate remotely from the region with fair access to a urban standard of living.   These are the weights I assigned:</p>

Economic and Commercial Environment (0%) &#8211; Used in the original index to measure time and costs for building a standard warehouse, registering a property, exporting/importing cargo, and rate corruption and foreign bond, it seemed mostly irrelevant for the purpose of this index, so I left it out.
Economic Growth and Development (10%) &#8211; Measuring the broad economic health and growth of the national economy this dimension seems to be the best way of describing the level of infrastructure that will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/studies/2008/emi/index.html">Emerging Markets Index</a> <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/pdfs/2008/MCWW_EMI_Global_Launch_Release.pdf">released by Mastercard</a> back in October, I&#8217;ve created something I&#8217;m going to call the Emerging Destination Index as a tool to provide clues as to which non-traditional tourist destinations may provide the fundamental infrastructure to sustain the type of travellers that I&#8217;ve been discussing over the last little while in this blog.   </p>
<p>The original <a href="http://www.mastercard.com/us/company/en/insights/studies/2008/emi/indexchart.html">index data is available</a> from Mastercard, and all I did was to reconfigure the weights assigned by the original methodology to assign more value to those dimensions that have a higher impact on the ability of a traveller to operate remotely from the region with fair access to a urban standard of living.   These are the weights I assigned:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Economic and Commercial Environment (0%)</strong> &#8211; Used in the original index to measure time and costs for building a standard warehouse, registering a property, exporting/importing cargo, and rate corruption and foreign bond, it seemed mostly irrelevant for the purpose of this index, so I left it out.</li>
<li><strong>Economic Growth and Development (10%)</strong> &#8211; Measuring the broad economic health and growth of the national economy this dimension seems to be the best way of describing the level of infrastructure that will ultimately support most activities from those visiting.   It will also likely be related to the level scope of urban areas and the availability of important infrastructure outside of the major cities.</li>
<li><strong>Business Environment (7%) </strong>- Reflects the ability to setup a business.  After all in order for travellers to gain access to the region, business must prosper along with all their suppliers, just so the visitors can enjoy their stay with a guarantee of fundamental services.</li>
<li><strong>Financial Services Environment (6%)</strong> &#8211; The availability of financial services to sustain the traveller during the stay.</li>
<li><strong>Commercial Connectivity (16%)</strong> &#8211; While I made the point that no place on Earth is remote anymore, this dimension measures city connectivity to other world and regional commercial centers by air, airline passenger volumes, presence of foreign consulates/embassies, international hotels, convention/meeting facilities, and international trade.</li>
<li><strong>Education, and IT Connectivity Environment (12%)</strong> &#8211; The availability of basic IT infrastructure may be key for those trying to maintain their links to work life active while on the region.</li>
<li><strong>Quality of Urban Life (28%)</strong> &#8211; Measures the quality of life by considering: personal freedom/media and censorship, medical and health considerations, public services and transport, recreation and culture, mortality, and the presence of world heritage sites.   For someone looking to make a trip to a region for a few weeks, this dimension alone provides the most important aspect of the index on whether the visit will be full of memorable experiences.</li>
<li><strong>Risk &#038; Security (21%)</strong> &#8211; Gauges a city’s overall risk and security through personal freedom, personal physical safety and the political and social environment.  A concern in most emerging regions continues to be personal security and while a destination may be inviting, venturing outside of the usual tourist destinations will require the region to provide a basic safety guarantee.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here are the top 10 destinations according to this index:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-size: 135%">Shanghai</li>
<li style="font-size: 130%">Budapest</li>
<li style="font-size: 125%">Warsaw</li>
<li style="font-size: 120%">Beijing</li>
<li style="font-size: 115%">Buenos Aires</li>
<li style="font-size: 110%">Kuala Lumpur</li>
<li style="font-size: 105%">Sao Paulo</li>
<li style="font-size: 100%">Santiago</li>
<li style="font-size: 95%">Mexico City</li>
<li style="font-size: 90%">Bangkok</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ll be happy to share the full list of 65 with anyone that is interested.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/emerging-destination-index/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>cities with most twitter users</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caracas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dublin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madrid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santiago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sydney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taipei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by TwitterLocal.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:
167830</p>

Tokyo &#8211; 13.5%
New York &#8211; 9.2%
San Francisco &#8211; 6.1%
Los Angeles &#8211; 5.9%
London &#8211; 4.9%
Washington &#8211; 4.1%
Chicago &#8211; 3.9%
Boston &#8211; 3.0%
Seattle &#8211; 3.0%
Sao Paulo &#8211; 2.7%

<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Continuing with the exploration of cities with a population actively engaged in global communications, here is a snapshot of the top 30 cities with most tweets (twitter messages) as calculated by <a href="http://www.twitterlocal.net/stats">TwitterLocal</a>.  The link presents the top 30 in the last 24 hours, here is a snapshot at the time of publishing:<br />
167830</p>
<ul>
<li style="font-size:150%">Tokyo &#8211; <abbr title="22,697">13.5%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:130%">New York &#8211; <abbr title="15,410">9.2%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">San Francisco &#8211; <abbr title="10,257">6.1%<abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:115%">Los Angeles &#8211; <abbr title="9,941">5.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:110%">London &#8211; <abbr title="8,276">4.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Washington &#8211; <abbr title="6,948">4.1%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:105%">Chicago &#8211; <abbr title="6,513">3.9%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Boston &#8211; <abbr title="5,064">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Seattle &#8211; <abbr title="5,002">3.0%</abbr></li>
<li style="font-size:100%">Sao Paulo &#8211; <abbr title="4,457">2.7%</abbr></li>
</ul>
<p>Other cities outside of North America included in the list:  Osaka, Madrid, Sydney, Amsterdam, Paris, Melbourne, Berlin, Bangkok, Barcelona, Taipei, Santiago, Dublin and Caracas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/cities-with-most-twitter-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>c40 climate summit</title>
		<link>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/</link>
		<comments>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addis ababa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bangkok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcelona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[berlin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cairo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jakarta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[johannesburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lagos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[london]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melbourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moscow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mumbai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sao paulo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seoul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockholm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tokyo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warsaw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/05/13/c40-climate-summit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Next week the Mayors from 40 of the world&#8217;s largest cities will gather in New York to review progress, share best practices, identify collaboration opportunities and set action plans to fight climate change.   The C40 Large Cities Climate Summit program will include topics such as Beating Congestion, Decentralized Energy, Efficient Water Supply, Climate Change in the context of Economic Development, Green Buildings, Waste Management &#038; Low Carbon Economies.  </p>
<p>In big city I had pointed out how the action of the largest cities is what really matters when dealing with global problems.  10% of the world&#8217;s population live in 100 of the largest cities alone.  Through management of their infrastructure, landfills, treatment plans, legislation of local land use policies to drive development in the right direction, regulation of automobiles and their energy plants, the overall impact they can exercise is significant.</p>
<p>The delegates attending will represent (bold indicates among 10 largest cities in the world):</p>
<p>Melbourne, Sydney (Australia)
Dhaka (Bangladesh)
Curitiba, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo (Brazil)
Toronto (Canada)
Beijing, Shanghai (China)
Bogota (Colombia)
Copenhagen (Denmark)
Cairo (Egypt)
Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)
Paris (France)
Berlin (Germany)
Delhi, Mumbai (India)
Jakarta (Indonesia)
Rome (Italy)
Tokyo (Japan)
Mexico City (Mexico)
Rotterdam (Netherlands)
Lagos (Nigeria)
Karachi (Pakistan)
Lima (Peru)
Warsaw (Poland)
Moscow (Russia)
Johannesburg (South Africa)
Seoul (South Korea)
Barcelona, Madrid (Spain)
Stockholm (Sweden)
Bangkok (Thailand)
Istanbul (Turkey)
London (United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next week the Mayors from 40 of the world&#8217;s largest cities will gather in New York to review progress, share best practices, identify collaboration opportunities and set action plans to fight climate change.   The <a href="http://www.nycclimatesummit.com/">C40 Large Cities Climate Summit</a> program will include topics such as Beating Congestion, Decentralized Energy, Efficient Water Supply, Climate Change in the context of Economic Development, Green Buildings, Waste Management &#038; Low Carbon Economies.  </p>
<p>In <a href="http://global-culture.org/blog/2007/02/08/big-city/">big city</a> I had pointed out how the action of the largest cities is what really matters when dealing with global problems.  10% of the world&#8217;s population live in 100 of the largest cities alone.  Through management of their infrastructure, landfills, treatment plans, legislation of local land use policies to drive development in the right direction, regulation of automobiles and their energy plants, the overall impact they can exercise is significant.</p>
<p>The delegates attending will represent (<b>bold</b> indicates among 10 largest cities in the world):</p>
<p>Melbourne, Sydney (Australia)<br />
<b>Dhaka</b> (Bangladesh)<br />
Curitiba, Rio de Janeiro, <b>Sao Paulo</b> (Brazil)<br />
Toronto (Canada)<br />
Beijing, Shanghai (China)<br />
Bogota (Colombia)<br />
Copenhagen (Denmark)<br />
Cairo (Egypt)<br />
Addis Ababa (Ethiopia)<br />
Paris (France)<br />
Berlin (Germany)<br />
<b>Delhi, Mumbai</b> (India)<br />
<b>Jakarta</b> (Indonesia)<br />
Rome (Italy)<br />
<b>Tokyo</b> (Japan)<br />
<b>Mexico City</b> (Mexico)<br />
Rotterdam (Netherlands)<br />
Lagos (Nigeria)<br />
Karachi (Pakistan)<br />
Lima (Peru)<br />
Warsaw (Poland)<br />
Moscow (Russia)<br />
Johannesburg (South Africa)<br />
Seoul (South Korea)<br />
Barcelona, Madrid (Spain)<br />
Stockholm (Sweden)<br />
Bangkok (Thailand)<br />
Istanbul (Turkey)<br />
London (United Kingdom)<br />
Austin, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, New Orleans, <b>New York</b>, Philadelphia, Salt Lake City, San Francisco, Seattle, Portland (United States)</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong>   Mayor David Miller of Toronto is now chair of the <a href="http://www.c40cities.org/">C40</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://global-culture.org/c40-climate-summit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

